As a sort of side gig while I'm trying to find a job, I've recently started writing for a few food blogs that are based out of the DC area (or at least read here). I thought I'd post a recent entry (I will probably cross-post my articles on my personal weblog, so more people can benefit from them, learn new things, or otherwise be amused). This article is actually my second posting. For the first one, there's a link in the article below...
Doug asks: Why it is that my burgers never turn out to be "restaurant quality" when I grill?
Chef YDB writes: This, actually, is a very common question. Generally, people who have burgers that aren't quite what they expected tend to make one of two mistakes. They're either making their patties too big (which is bad because by the time the middle of the patty is cooked to temperature, the outside is charred beyond belief – a good burger should be no more than three-quarters of an inch thick), or they're using beef that is too lean (see the tip in my last post about fat).
Joanne asks: Is it necessary to sear meat in hot fat before stewing or braising it in broth or water?
Chef YDB writes: Many chefs have different reasons for doing this (or not doing it). One common answer is that this "locks in the juices." Unfortunately, that's not true. The reason that those chefs who opt to sear meat do so is because searing meat gets the outside of the meat hot enough to brown, which adds flavour. Any food cooked solely in water or broth never gets hotter than the boiling point of water (212 degrees Farenheit at sea level). Browning in fat allows the outside of the meat to reach much higher temperatures - usually 300 to 500 degrees. Those high temperatures quickly create intense flavours, rich brown colours, and crackling crusts. This is due toa chemical reaction called the Maillard reaction, where carbohydrates react chemically with amino compounds in proteins to create browning, deeper flavours, and great aromas. Personally, I always sear meat before stewing or braising it. Some chefs disagree, but hey, the flavour difference is certainly there.
Rob asks: If veal is essentially young beef, shouldn't it be thought of as a more tender "cut" (i.e. more suitable for drier cooking methods)? Why is it that almost every recipe I've seen for veal involves moist cooking methods?
Chef YDB writes: Have you ever noticed that at a lot of restaurants, veal isn't really done right, and winds up tasting like you're eating a tire? That's because they usually use drier cooking methods. Veal has a high proportion of connective tissue to muscle fiber because the young animal has not had time to put on extra weight. However, because it's a young animal, veal's connective tissue is more soluble than that in beef. Cooking veal with moisture (i.e. a moist cooking method) therefore makes sense because it allows that connective tissue to soften.
Got a food question you'd like me to answer? Send them into to rabbi@rottenrabbi.com
Del.icio.us
Comments (5)
Nicely done. My suggestion for your next column would be to give us easy things to do with that boring chicken breast. As someone who does not spend much time in the kitchen, I am always looking for healthy, delicious things to do with chicken breast. Any guidance on how to make a simple dish, that doesn't require much in the way of cooking prowess or ingredients, would be great.
Posted by RCDC22 | June 11, 2006 1:52 PM
Posted on June 11, 2006 13:52
I've got two comments.
1 - I liked your use of the european speeling of "flavour" in the DC:Fud posting. Very worldly.
2 - This is addresses to RCDC22: Hey, I thought you preferred dark meat? Chicken Breast??
Posted by Yogi | June 11, 2006 7:18 PM
Posted on June 11, 2006 19:18
Yeah, she says she prefers the dark meat, but then something like this comes out. Grand-daughter of a chicken farmer she's apparently not. :-)
Posted by The Good Rabbi | June 12, 2006 1:46 PM
Posted on June 12, 2006 13:46
Yogi,
You are correct, I do prefer dark meat but in the interests of my health and the health of others-- I want to eat more chicken breast. If it is to be at all palatable, I will need the Rotten Rabbi's kind assistance.
Posted by RCDC22 | June 12, 2006 1:47 PM
Posted on June 12, 2006 13:47
Health? There is no real difference between white and dark meat healthwise. Dark meat has more fat around it if the skin is used, but nobody says you have to use the skin. Also, dark meat has more flavour... :-)
Posted by The Good Rabbi | June 14, 2006 5:59 AM
Posted on June 14, 2006 05:59